A busy day, beginning with a run. Another stunning day in the offing. Into the House, routine matters and then down to the Chamber for Cabinet Office Questions. I had been selected for a Topical Question, and being last on the Order Paper, I was unsure whether I'd be called. As it happened, I was, and it came just before PMQs. I asked the minister to reassure me that Government departments would work together to deliver the ambitious plans that we have to create more jobs and prosperity in Weymouth and on Portland. I received a most encouraging reply, so will continue to lobby hard on behalf of my constituents. During PMQs that followed, Corbyn referred to my friend and colleague Jacob Rees-Mogg in a disparaging way, claiming that he was moving his hedgefund out of the UK. The inference is obvious. At the end of PMQs, Jacob rose to make a point of order. At this stage Corbyn was still in the Chamber. He sat and listened while Jacob courteously explained that he did not have a hedgefund and could therefore not remove it from the UK. There were calls from our side of the House for Corbyn to apologise, but he simply shook his head and refused to. I'm afraid my blood boiled at this point and I rose very shortly afterwards to make my own point of order. I sought the Speaker's advice on how an MP who either intentionally or unintentionally misled the House could be brought to book. The Speaker went to some length to explain that because we'd never know if Corbyn's accusation was intentional or not he was not in a place to demand anything from the Labour leader. At best, Corbyn's behaviour was a disgrace; at worst it was an intentional lie to stir up trouble. But, that is the man. Afterwards, I wolfed down a sandwich before heading to meet the Prime Minister with seven other colleagues. The meeting was in confidence, and I intend to keep it that way. From there I rushed to CR 16 for a session of our European Scrutiny Committee. Today we took oral evidence on Brexit from four professionals. They were Dr Katy Hayward, a Reader in Sociology at Queen's University, Belfast, Shanker Singham, Director of the International Trade and Competition Unit of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Dr Lorand Bartels, a Reader in International Law in the Faculty of Law and a Fellow of Trinity Hall, Cambridge, and Professor David Collins, Professor of International Economic Law at the City Law School, University of London. As the impressive titles may suggest, the session was quite heavy going, and if you want to learn more can I suggest you go to Hansard. There was no vote at the end of the debate on the Offensive Weapons Bill, but there is much concern among many Conservative MPs.